In this Review Journal editorial about the attorney general race which is
the most high-profile -- and, arguably, important -- state constitutional officer.
it stated that,
While we initially had high hopes for Ms. Masto, she's proved a disappointment. Mr. Barrick is marginally qualified. Joel Hansen, with perhaps the best ideas, is an Independent American with little chance of being elected.
Voters don't have a good choice for attorney general this election cycle. More's the pity.
After reading the article, it seemed that you felt that Mr. Hansen was the best candidate. One of these three will get elected. Do you base your endorsements on who is the best candidate or do you just endorse the candidate who you think will win?
No comments:
Post a Comment